AI in Medical Diagnostics 2020-2030: Image Recognition, Players, Clinical Applications, Forecasts.

Benchmarking 60+ companies for image recognition AI performance, market readiness, value proposition, technical maturity and more. Granular forecasts for 12 clinical applications, insights into addressable market size and penetration until 2030.


- Towards wider applicability: The days of leaps in performance of image recognition are over, barring radical innovation in algorithm techniques. The gains in precision, recall and other metrics will henceforth be incremental. As such, the emphasis has shifted to other points. Of importance is showing that the AI is applicable to as wide a population set (ie: gender, age, ethnicity, tissue density, etc.) as possible.
- Evolving beyond simple abnormality identification towards super-human insights: Whilst there is a spread in what different algorithms are offering, most are positioned as decision support tools. The next evolution will be to provide further information and explanations alongside the detection and segmentation. Some are even aiming to suggest treatment options, hoping to evolve beyond the radiologist scope and to encroach into the doctors’ sphere of competency, although this is generally further down the line. In short, the goal is to raise the AI complexity beyond anomaly detection.
- Scale: Our view is that scale will matter in this business. Large scale, if done right, (a) means more access to data, which translates into an ever widening performance gap against competitors in terms of algorithm accuracy, versatility, and applicability; (b) creates a one-stop-shop proposition, helping with the sales and customer acquisition process; (c) results in larger technical teams that can aid the on-site into-work-flow integration process, which in turn boosts installed base and acts a lock-in mechanism. In general, scale can help the winners drive consolidation.


- How does AI performance in image analysis compare to human level in accuracy, speed, and cost?
- What does the competitive landscape look like in each disease segment? Who are the key players and emerging start-ups? How do companies benchmark and differentiate? How can they grow beyond a good tech story?
- How do competitors’ AI software compare to each other and which companies are leading the pack?
- How is the AI software distributed? Can it be integrated into imaging equipment?
- What is the state of development of this technology today and how will it evolve in the next ten years in performance and beyond simple anomaly detection tasks?
- What are the main clinical applications of image recognition AI? What are the drivers and constraints of market growth in each segment?
- How can pricing strategies impact the implementation of image recognition AI in medical diagnostics?
- What is the market (volume and value) of this technology, and how and why will this change over the next decade?
1. | EXECUTIVE SUMMARY |
1.1. | Report scope |
1.2. | Image recognition AI in medical imaging |
1.3. | Drivers & constraints of AI in medical imaging |
1.4. | Benefits of using AI in medical diagnostics |
1.5. | Clinical applications of image recognition AI covered in this report |
1.6. | Investments into image recognition AI companies by disease application |
1.7. | Image recognition AI: Performance comparison by application |
1.8. | Cancer detection AI: State of development and market readiness |
1.9. | Cancer detection AI companies: State of product development |
1.10. | Cancer detection AI: Conclusions and outlook |
1.11. | Cancer detection AI: Conclusions and outlook (2) |
1.12. | CVD detection AI: State of development and market readiness |
1.13. | CVD detection AI companies: State of product development |
1.14. | CVD detection AI: Conclusions and outlook |
1.15. | Respiratory diseases detection AI: State of development and market readiness |
1.16. | Respiratory diseases detection AI companies: State of product development |
1.17. | Respiratory diseases detection AI: Conclusions and outlook |
1.18. | Retinal diseases detection AI: State of development and market readiness |
1.19. | Retinal diseases detection AI companies: State of product development |
1.20. | Retinal diseases detection AI: Conclusions and outlook |
1.21. | Retinal diseases detection AI: Conclusions and outlook (2) |
1.22. | NDD detection AI: State of development and market readiness |
1.23. | NDD detection AI companies: State of product development |
1.24. | NDD detection AI: Conclusions and outlook |
1.25. | Image recognition AI: Technological roadmap |
1.26. | Image recognition AI: Roadmap of factors limiting penetration |
1.27. | Image recognition AI: Market penetration 2020-2040 |
1.28. | Market forecast 2020-2031 by disease application |
1.29. | AI provides real value and the market is rapidly growing |
1.30. | Remaining challenges |
1.31. | Opportunities for technological improvements |
1.32. | Why do image recognition AI companies struggle to achieve profitability? |
2. | INTRODUCTION |
2.1. | Report scope |
2.2. | Medical imaging advances diagnostics |
2.3. | Types of medical imaging |
2.4. | Uses, pros and cons of each type of imaging |
2.5. | X-radiation (X-ray) |
2.6. | Computed tomography (CT) |
2.7. | Positron emission tomography (PET) |
2.8. | Magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) |
2.9. | Ultrasound |
2.10. | Imaging devices: Regulations & path to approval |
2.11. | Radiation from imaging devices: Safety regulations |
2.12. | Image recognition AI in medical imaging |
2.13. | Drivers & constraints of AI in medical imaging |
2.14. | AI in healthcare: Existing regulations |
2.15. | AI in healthcare: Regulations & path to approval |
2.16. | Clinical applications of image recognition AI covered in this report |
2.17. | Interest in AI and deep learning has soared in the last five years… |
2.18. | … And so have investments into image recognition AI companies |
2.19. | CVD and cancer have generated the most funding |
3. | ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE, DEEP LEARNING AND CONVOLUTIONAL NEURAL NETWORKS |
3.1. | What is artificial intelligence (AI)? Terminologies explained |
3.2. | The two main types of AI in healthcare |
3.3. | Requirements for AI in medical imaging |
3.4. | Main deep learning (DL) approaches |
3.5. | DL makes automated image recognition possible |
3.6. | Image recognition AI is based on convolutional neural networks (CNNs) |
3.7. | Workings of CNNs: How are images processed? |
3.8. | Workings of CNNs: Another example |
3.9. | Common CNN architectures for image recognition |
3.10. | Milestones in DL: Image recognition surpasses human level |
3.11. | How do image recognition AI algorithms learn to detect disease? |
3.12. | The depth and variation of training data dictate the robustness of image recognition AI algorithms |
3.13. | Assessing algorithm performance: The importance of true/false positives/negatives |
3.14. | Measures in deep learning: Sensitivity and Specificity |
3.15. | DL algorithms assess the rate of true/false positives/negatives to determine sensitivity and specificity |
3.16. | Measures in deep learning: Area Under Curve (AUC) or area under curve of receiver operating characteristics (AUCROC) |
3.17. | When AUC is not a good measure of the algorithm success? |
3.18. | Measures in deep learning: Reproducibility |
3.19. | F1 Score |
3.20. | Benefits of using AI in medical diagnostics |
3.21. | Drivers of image recognition AI usage |
3.22. | Limiting factors of image recognition AI using CNNs |
4. | CANCER |
4.1. | Image recognition enhances cancer diagnostic solutions |
4.2. | Investments into cancer detection AI companies |
4.3. | Image recognition AI for cancer detection: Key players |
4.4. | Breast cancer |
4.5. | Breast cancer: Detection and quantification of breast densities via mammography (2018) |
4.6. | Breast cancer screening via mammograms and pathology slides |
4.7. | Lunit: Breast cancer screening via mammography |
4.8. | Reproducible breast cancer screening: Densitas, Kheiron Medical, and Therapixel |
4.9. | Therapixel: Early breast cancer detection |
4.10. | CureMetrix: AI estimates the risk of disease |
4.11. | Google: Surpassing human performance regardless of patient population type |
4.12. | Google: Surpassing human performance regardless of patient population type (2) |
4.13. | On the market: Intrasense, ScreenPoint Medical, Qlarity Imaging and Koios Medical |
4.14. | Currently on the market or upcoming: Qview Medical, PathAI and Zebra Medical Vision |
4.15. | AI performance comparison: Methodology |
4.16. | Breast cancer detection AI: Performance comparison |
4.17. | Breast cancer detection AI: Performance comparison (2) |
4.18. | Lung cancer |
4.19. | Lung cancer: NYU uses DL on lung cancer histopathological images to identify cancer cells, determine their type, and predict what somatic mutations are present in the tumour |
4.20. | Lung cancer: Detection made easier |
4.21. | Infervision: Detecting nodules three times faster than radiologists |
4.22. | Enlitic: Identifying malignant lung nodules 18 months sooner |
4.23. | Arterys: Accelerating reading time by 45% |
4.24. | Additional players: VUNO, Lunit, Intrasense & VoxelCloud |
4.25. | Additional players: Behold.ai, Aidence, Mindshare Medical & Riverain Technologies |
4.26. | Lung cancer detection AI: Performance comparison |
4.27. | Lung cancer detection AI: Performance comparison (2) |
4.28. | Skin cancer |
4.29. | Skin cancer: Key players |
4.30. | Skin cancer: Machine learning algorithms |
4.31. | Skin cancer: The ABCDE criteria |
4.32. | Skin cancer: Dermoscopic melanoma recognition (2018) |
4.33. | Skin cancer: Dermoscopic melanoma recognition and its challenges |
4.34. | Miiskin: Tracking skin changes over time |
4.35. | SkinVision: Risk assessment and unparalleled accuracy at a low cost |
4.36. | MetaOptima: Medical grade image quality for the consumer |
4.37. | Stanford University: Automated classification of skin lesions |
4.38. | Mole mapping apps track skin changes over time: SkinIO, Skin Analytics & University of Michigan |
4.39. | Skin cancer detection AI: Performance comparison |
4.40. | Skin cancer detection AI: Performance comparison (2) |
4.41. | Thyroid cancer: AmCad BioMed automatically identifies nodules |
4.42. | Prostate cancer: Cortechs Labs improves a key visualisation and quantification method |
4.43. | Prostate cancer: Intrasense and YITU Technology |
4.44. | Microsoft: Using AI for cancer detection, radiotherapy planning and outcome monitoring |
4.45. | AI-driven histological analysis of tissue slides for cancer detection: Paige & Primaa |
4.46. | Cancer detection AI: Performance comparison |
4.47. | Cancer detection AI: State of development and market readiness |
4.48. | Cancer detection AI applications: State of development |
4.49. | Cancer detection AI companies: State of product development |
4.50. | Cancer detection AI companies: Software complexity |
4.51. | Conclusions and outlook |
4.52. | Conclusions and outlook (2) |
5. | CARDIOVASCULAR DISEASE |
5.1. | What is cardiovascular disease (CVD) and where does image recognition AI apply? |
5.2. | AI can provide solutions to improve CVD management |
5.3. | Investments into CVD detection AI companies |
5.4. | Using imaging & AI to detect clots and blockages |
5.5. | Key players |
5.6. | Stroke |
5.7. | Stroke detection AI: Key players |
5.8. | MIT: A DL solution for stroke detection from CT scans |
5.9. | iSchemaView: Categorising the extent and location of ischemic injury up to 30 hours post-symptoms onset |
5.10. | Infervision: Dynamic and risk assessment of active bleeding |
5.11. | MaxQ AI: Near real-time detection, triage and annotation of stroke injury |
5.12. | Qure.ai: Identifying 5 types of intracranial haemorrhages |
5.13. | Other stroke detection companies: Aidoc, Zebra Medical Vision and Quantib |
5.14. | Stroke detection AI: Performance comparison |
5.15. | Stroke detection AI: Performance comparison (2) |
5.16. | Coronary heart disease (CHD) & myocardial infarction |
5.17. | CHD detection AI: Key players |
5.18. | CHD: Cornell & NYU’s DL approach to diagnosis |
5.19. | HeartFlow: Assessing the impact of coronary blockages on cardiac blood supply |
5.20. | Circle Cardiovascular Imaging: Automated plaque assessment |
5.21. | Other CHD detection AI companies: Intrasense, CASIS & VoxelCloud |
5.22. | Assessing blood flow |
5.23. | Assessing blood flow: Key players |
5.24. | Arterys: Quantifying blood flow in minutes |
5.25. | Pie Medical Imaging: Calculating blood flow from 3D phase-contrast MR images |
5.26. | On the market: NeoSoft, HeartFlow, iSchemaView & Circle Cardiovascular Imaging |
5.27. | Blood flow detection AI: Performance comparison |
5.28. | Cardiac function |
5.29. | Ejection fraction is key for evaluating cardiac function, and AI allows for more accurate measurements |
5.30. | Cardiac function detection AI: Key players |
5.31. | Philips: Assessing cardiac performance, strength and structure |
5.32. | NeoSoft: automated segmentation for cardiac function and myocardial characterisation |
5.33. | Other cardiac function players: TomTec, DiA Imaging Analysis, GE Healthcare & BioMedical Image Analysis Group |
5.34. | Cardiac function detection AI: Performance comparison |
5.35. | CVD detection AI: Performance comparison |
5.36. | CVD detection AI: State of development and market readiness |
5.37. | CVD detection AI applications: State of development |
5.38. | CVD detection AI companies: State of product development |
5.39. | CVD detection AI companies: Software complexity |
5.40. | Conclusions and outlook |
6. | RESPIRATORY DISEASES |
6.1. | How can AI improve respiratory disease diagnosis? |
6.2. | Investments into respiratory diseases detection AI companies |
6.3. | Key players |
6.4. | VIDA: Identifying asthma and COPD |
6.5. | Infervision: Level of pneumonia infection as a percentage |
6.6. | SemanticMD: Probability score for tuberculosis |
6.7. | Lunit: Algorithm detects 9 different respiratory disorders |
6.8. | VUNO: Cutting image reading time by half |
6.9. | Arterys: Displaying negative findings for rule out support |
6.10. | Qure.ai: Detecting multiple chest abnormalities |
6.11. | AI embedded into imaging device: GE Healthcare |
6.12. | On the market: Aidoc, Zebra Medical Vision, Intrasense & Behold.ai |
6.13. | In development: Artelus, Enlitic & SigTuple |
6.14. | Respiratory diseases detection AI: Performance comparison |
6.15. | Respiratory diseases detection AI: Algorithm comparison (2) |
6.16. | COVID-19 |
6.17. | COVID-19: Key players |
6.18. | COVID-19: Infervision |
6.19. | COVID-19: Other companies |
6.20. | COVID-19 detection AI: Performance comparison |
6.21. | COVID-19 detection AI: Algorithm comparison (2) |
6.22. | Respiratory diseases detection AI: Performance comparison |
6.23. | Respiratory diseases detection AI: State of development and market readiness |
6.24. | Respiratory diseases detection AI applications: State of development |
6.25. | Respiratory diseases detection AI companies: State of product development |
6.26. | Respiratory diseases detection AI companies: Software complexity |
6.27. | Conclusions and outlook |
7. | RETINAL DISEASES |
7.1. | What are retinal diseases and how are they detected? |
7.2. | AI can reach expert level of disease detection in 10 days, compared to 20 years for humans |
7.3. | Investments into retinal diseases detection AI companies |
7.4. | Key players |
7.5. | Artelus: Detecting DR by ensuring image quality |
7.6. | VUNO: Identifying 12 types of eye disorders |
7.7. | SemanticMD: AI solution for use offline |
7.8. | SigTuple: Applying AI to multiple imaging modalities |
7.9. | Pr3vent: Detects 50+ pathologies in newborns |
7.10. | Currently in clinical trials: Novai, Verily & Capital University of Medical Sciences |
7.11. | On the market or upcoming: VoxelCloud, Singapore National Eye Centre & CERA |
7.12. | Retinal diseases detection AI: Performance comparison |
7.13. | Retinal diseases detection AI: Performance comparison (2) |
7.14. | Retinal diseases detection AI: Performance comparison (3) |
7.15. | Retinal diseases detection AI: State of development and market readiness |
7.16. | Retinal diseases detection AI companies: State of product development |
7.17. | Retinal diseases detection AI companies: Software complexity |
7.18. | Conclusions and outlook |
7.19. | Conclusions and outlook (2) |
8. | NEURODEGENERATIVE DISEASES |
8.1. | AI can identify signs of dementia years before its onset |
8.2. | Investments into neurodegenerative diseases detection AI companies |
8.3. | Key players |
8.4. | Quantib: Measuring brain size and atrophy |
8.5. | Icometrix: Diagnosing various NDDs |
8.6. | Cortechs Labs: Automated quantification of brain structure volume |
8.7. | Avalon AI: Interpreting multiple MRI modalities |
8.8. | VUNO: Immediate segmentation and parcellation |
8.9. | University of Bari: Predicting Alzheimer’s disease up to a decade before onset |
8.10. | On the market: Qure.ai & Siemens Healthineers |
8.11. | In development: IDx, Icahn School of Medicine, UCSF |
8.12. | Research only: BioMedical Image Group, Imperial College London & University of Edinburgh |
8.13. | Research only: McGill & University College London |
8.14. | NDD detection AI: Performance comparison |
8.15. | NDD detection AI: Performance comparison (2) |
8.16. | NDD detection AI: Performance comparison (3) |
8.17. | NDD detection AI: State of development and market readiness |
8.18. | NDD detection AI companies: State of product development |
8.19. | NDD detection AI companies: Software complexity |
8.20. | Conclusions and outlook |
9. | MARKET ANALYSIS |
9.1. | Geographic segmentation: Almost 50% of medical diagnostics AI companies are based in the USA |
9.2. | Modality segmentation: Over half of medical diagnostics AI companies focus on CT and X-ray imaging |
9.3. | Image recognition AI: Technological roadmap |
9.4. | Image recognition AI: Technological roadmap (2) |
9.5. | Image recognition AI: Technological roadmap (3) |
9.6. | Image recognition AI: Roadmap of factors limiting penetration |
9.7. | Image recognition AI: Roadmap of factors limiting penetration (2) |
9.8. | Image recognition AI: Roadmap of factors limiting penetration (3) |
9.9. | Market analysis methodology |
9.10. | Addressable markets are growing, with some exceptions, and AI use is expected to mirror this trend |
9.11. | Scan volume per year: AI use will rise as its adoption increases |
9.12. | Image recognition AI: Market penetration 2020-2040 |
9.13. | Image recognition AI: Market penetration 2020-2040 (2) |
9.14. | Image recognition AI: Market penetration 2020-2040 (3) |
9.15. | Image recognition AI: Market penetration 2020-2040 (4) |
9.16. | Business models: Subscription vs Pay Per Use |
9.17. | Market share in 2019: CVD detection |
9.18. | Market forecast 2020-2031 by disease application |
9.19. | Market forecast 2020-2031: CVD detection |
9.20. | Market forecast 2020-2031: Cancer detection |
10. | CONCLUSIONS & OUTLOOK |
10.1. | AI provides real value and the market is rapidly growing |
10.2. | Remaining challenges: Improving data curation and algorithm training procedures |
10.3. | Remaining challenges: Need for clearer images |
10.4. | Remaining challenges: Regulations and data privacy |
10.5. | Opportunities for technological improvements |
10.6. | Cloud-based vs offline software |
10.7. | Moving towards equipment-integrated AI software? |
10.8. | Why do image recognition AI companies struggle to achieve profitability? |
11. | LIST OF COMPANIES |
11.1. | Cancer detection AI |
11.2. | CVD detection AI |
11.3. | Respiratory diseases detection AI |
11.4. | Retinal diseases detection AI |
11.5. | Neurodegenerative diseases detection AI |